IPPRA / Grant Monitor

2026-07-07
← Board

Advanced Nuclear Energy Licensing Cost-Share Grant Program

DE-FOA-0003339 · Idaho Field Office

energy materials manufacturing environment Energy

Closes
2026-09-30 · 85 d
Award ceiling
$8,000,000
Award floor
$5,000
Program funding
$50,000,000
Expected awards
25
Cost sharing
No
Posted
2025-01-08
Instrument
Grant
Characterization · gpt-5.4-mini · 2026-07-07

Cost-shared grants support licensing-related work for advanced nuclear energy projects under the U.S. Advanced Nuclear Energy Licensing Cost-Share Grant Program.

Funds
applied research
University
unclear
physical sciences
central
engineering
central
computational data
minor

⚑ Cost-share required/implicit in program title. · Application window is July 1–September 30 for the current cycle; deadline changed. · Eligibility text was not provided in the notice excerpt, so applicant class restrictions cannot be confirmed from the supplied information.

Unit fits — one characterization, each unit's own rules

Physical Sciences & Engineering (demo) 75 strong technical depth: central; funds applied research
IPPRA 45 partial portfolio topics: energy, environment (primary); social/behavioral work is none; funds applied research; eligibility unclear — verify in the NOFO; capped at 45 (limited social-science role)
Tom Love Innovation Hub 45 partial funds applied research; prototyping/demonstration stage; deep-tech content

Description

U.S. Advanced Nuclear Energy Licensing Cost-Share Grant Program The application deadline for current review cycle, anticipated selection notification date for the current review cycle, and anticipated award date for current review cycle have changed. See date changes on page 6 of NOFO Part 1. Also, applications must now be submitted within the respective application period (July 1 – September 30). See date changes on page 24 of NOFO Part 1.

Apply

View on Grants.gov → CONTACT: Idaho Field Office <allenar@id.doe.gov>

Proposal brief SEE AN EXAMPLE →

A one-page internal memo: fit assessment, submission requirements, document scaffold, and next steps dated back from the deadline — tailored to your project idea if you add one.

ONE LLM CALL (~1¢) · CACHED · REQUIRES STAFF KEY

Proposal shell · Department of Energy conventions SEE A DOE EXAMPLE →

Funder-faithful document skeletons — Department of Energy's document set with section headings, page limits, reviewer guidance, and writing prompts; add a project idea to get [DRAFT] starter bullets. Download as .md for Word or Overleaf.

ONE LLM CALL (~2-3¢) · CACHED · SCAFFOLDING, NOT GHOSTWRITING

Legacy IPPRA LLM assessment (v2.0, for comparison)

18/100 · gpt-5.4-mini · 2026-07-06

This is an Energy opportunity, but it appears to be a cost-share program for advanced nuclear energy licensing rather than a research solicitation. The description does not indicate any social science, public opinion, risk communication, policy analysis, or evaluation component that IPPRA could lead, and the eligibility details are not provided here. Even if public universities are eligible, the fit is limited because the program is primarily regulatory/technical support rather than research at the human side of energy systems.

Legacy scoring history

2026-07-06 18 gpt-5.4-mini This is an Energy opportunity, but it appears to be a cost-share program for advanced nuclear energy licensing rather than a research solicitation. The description does not indicate any social science, public opinion, risk communication, policy analysis, or evaluation component that IPPRA could lead, and the eligibility details are not provided here. Even if public universities are eligible, the fit is limited because the program is primarily regulatory/technical support rather than research at the human side of energy systems.
2026-07-06 18 gpt-5.4-mini This is an advanced nuclear licensing cost-share program, which is clearly in IPPRA’s energy portfolio area, but the opportunity is centered on regulatory/licensing and technical commercialization rather than social science, public opinion, or policy research. A public university may be eligible as a grant applicant or partner, but based on the title and description there is no evident human-behavior or policy-analysis component that would make it a strong IPPRA fit.