Strengthening Uzbekistan’s Anti-Corruption Framework to Improve the Investment Climate
This grant funds projects that strengthen Uzbekistan’s anti-corruption framework and improve the investment climate through governance and accountability reforms.
⚑ Foreign-based organizations are eligible; award is limited to implementation of an anti-corruption/governance project in Uzbekistan. · This is not a research grant; primary purpose is reform support/technical assistance. · U.S. public state universities are not explicitly named but educational institutions eligible under the stated tax-code categories may apply if otherwise compliant.
Unit fits — one characterization, each unit's own rules
| IPPRA | 53 partial | outside portfolio topics; signature methods: policy analysis, community engaged; social/behavioral work is substantial; funds technical assistance, not research (capped) |
| Physical Sciences & Engineering (demo) | 25 weak | technical depth: minor; funds technical assistance (capped) |
| Tom Love Innovation Hub | 5 none | no commercialization signal |
Description
Open competition for eligible organizations to submit applications to implement a project that strengthens Uzbekistan’s anti-corruption framework and supports a more transparent, predictable, and competitive business environment. The project seeks to improve opportunities for U.S. companies and other legitimate investors by supporting reforms that reduce corruption risks, strengthen accountability, and promote fair market conditions.
Eligibility
U.S.-based non-profit/non-governmental organizations (NGOs); U.S.-based educational institutions subject to section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. tax code or section 26 US 115 of the U.S. tax code; Foreign-based non-profits/non-governmental organizations (NGOs); Foreign-based educational institutions; For-Profit Organizations. Please refer to: 'Section C: Eligibility Information' in the Full Announcement for more information.
Apply
Proposal brief SEE AN EXAMPLE →
A one-page internal memo: fit assessment, submission requirements, document scaffold, and next steps dated back from the deadline — tailored to your project idea if you add one.
Proposal shell · Federal (generic) conventions SEE A FEDERAL EXAMPLE →
Funder-faithful document skeletons — Federal (generic)'s document set with section headings, page limits, reviewer guidance, and writing prompts; add a project idea to get [DRAFT] starter bullets. Download as .md for Word or Overleaf.
Legacy IPPRA LLM assessment (v2.0, for comparison)
18/100 · gpt-5.4-mini · 2026-07-06
This is an international anti-corruption and investment-climate program with a governance/policy focus, not a research opportunity in IPPRA’s core technical-social domains. While there is a policy-analysis angle, it does not map meaningfully onto IPPRA’s portfolio areas, and the work appears to be implementation/support rather than research. U.S.-based educational institutions are eligible, but the opportunity is still too remote from IPPRA’s research mission to score above a weak fit.
Legacy scoring history
| 2026-07-06 | 18 | gpt-5.4-mini | This is an international anti-corruption and investment-climate program with a governance/policy focus, not a research opportunity in IPPRA’s core technical-social domains. While there is a policy-analysis angle, it does not map meaningfully onto IPPRA’s portfolio areas, and the work appears to be implementation/support rather than research. U.S.-based educational institutions are eligible, but the opportunity is still too remote from IPPRA’s research mission to score above a weak fit. |
| 2026-07-06 | 12 | gpt-5.4-mini | This is primarily an international governance/anticorruption and investment-climate grant, not a clear match to IPPRA’s core weather, energy, national security, or public health communication portfolios. There is a policy-research angle around corruption, regulation, and institutional accountability, but it is too far outside IPPRA’s main technical-social intersection to rate as more than a weak fit. A U.S. public university appears eligible, so the score is not capped for eligibility reasons. |