IPPRA / Grant Monitor

2026-07-07
← Board

Countering Foreign Terrorist Organization Use of Illicit Mining

DFOP0018686 · Bureau of Counterterrorism

national security defense justice law economic development international affairs Other

Closes
2026-07-15 · 8 d
Award ceiling
$4,933,399
Award floor
$2,000,000
Program funding
Expected awards
1
Cost sharing
No
Posted
2026-07-06
Instrument
Cooperative Agreement
Characterization · gpt-5.4-mini · 2026-07-07

Funds an integrated counterterrorism initiative to counter foreign terrorist organization exploitation of illicit mining, including work with law enforcement, mining regulators, judges/prosecutors, and civil society.

Funds
technical assistance
University
direct
social behavioral
substantial
physical sciences
minor
engineering
minor
computational data
minor

⚑ Cooperative agreement · Foreign terrorist organization and transnational criminal organization focus · Eligibility includes public and private educational institutions, nonprofits, for-profits, PIOs, and governmental institutions

Unit fits — one characterization, each unit's own rules

IPPRA 54 partial portfolio topic: national_security_defense (primary); signature methods: community engaged, policy analysis; social/behavioral work is substantial; funds technical assistance, not research (capped); capped at 54 (non-research funding)
Physical Sciences & Engineering (demo) 25 weak technical depth: minor; funds technical assistance (capped)
Tom Love Innovation Hub 5 none no commercialization signal

Description

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Counterterrorism (CT) is seeking proposals for an initiative that will address the exploitation of illicit mining by violent FTOs. Special focus should be on the relationship and involvement of FTOs and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs) in the space. Competitive proposals should take an integrated approach to the threat and include civilian law enforcement, mining sector regulators, judges and prosecutors, and civil society where appropriate.

Eligibility

- Not-for-profit organizations, including think tanks and civil society/non-governmental organizations; - Public and private educational institutions; - For-profit organizations; and - Public International Organizations (PIOs) and Governmental institutions.

Apply

View on Grants.gov →

Proposal brief SEE AN EXAMPLE →

A one-page internal memo: fit assessment, submission requirements, document scaffold, and next steps dated back from the deadline — tailored to your project idea if you add one.

ONE LLM CALL (~1¢) · CACHED · REQUIRES STAFF KEY

Proposal shell · Federal (generic) conventions SEE A FEDERAL EXAMPLE →

Funder-faithful document skeletons — Federal (generic)'s document set with section headings, page limits, reviewer guidance, and writing prompts; add a project idea to get [DRAFT] starter bullets. Download as .md for Word or Overleaf.

ONE LLM CALL (~2-3¢) · CACHED · SCAFFOLDING, NOT GHOSTWRITING

Legacy IPPRA LLM assessment (v2.0, for comparison)

18/100 · gpt-5.4-mini · 2026-07-06

This is a national security/terrorism program with an environmental-resource angle through illicit mining, but the core activity is counterterrorism capacity building and stakeholder coordination rather than research. IPPRA could only be a peripheral or evaluation partner at best, and the opportunity is broadly eligible to public universities but does not strongly support a research-led social science or policy study.

Legacy scoring history

2026-07-06 18 gpt-5.4-mini This is a national security/terrorism program with an environmental-resource angle through illicit mining, but the core activity is counterterrorism capacity building and stakeholder coordination rather than research. IPPRA could only be a peripheral or evaluation partner at best, and the opportunity is broadly eligible to public universities but does not strongly support a research-led social science or policy study.
2026-07-06 18 gpt-5.4-mini This is a national-security/terrorism program focused on illicit mining, criminal networks, and counter-FTO capacity, which is only tangentially related to IPPRA’s core social-science strengths. There is some possible policy and civil-society angle, but the opportunity appears operational and security-sector oriented rather than centered on behavioral, survey, or communication research. Public universities are explicitly eligible, but the topic is outside IPPRA’s main portfolio and fit remains weak.