Funder template: Department of Defense (BAA-style) · Opportunity: FA955026S0001 · closes no deadline stated

How reviewers read this: DoD reviewers weigh scientific merit, relevance to the component’s mission and warfighter/national-security needs, PI qualifications, and cost realism. Naming the program officer’s published research thrusts — and talking to them before submitting — matters more here than anywhere else.

Verify: DoD components differ sharply; most basic-research BAAs use a white paper -> invited full proposal flow. Mirror the specific BAA’s structure and page limits exactly — this template is the common denominator.

---

White Paper

Page limit: typically 3-5 pages — check the BAA.

Objective

State the technical objective in one short paragraph, then a second short paragraph describing the DoD-relevant problem it addresses. Frame the work as basic research aligned with AFOSR interests, not as a deployed product.

• What is the specific decision-support question about integrating severe-weather forecasts into airbase resilience planning?
• What fundamental gap in understanding or methods prevents installation emergency managers from making better forecast-informed resilience decisions?
• How does this problem connect to AFOSR’s research interests in national security/defense and space/aeronautics?
• [DRAFT] Develop fundamental decision-support methods for translating severe-weather forecasts into actionable resilience planning inputs for Air Force installations.
• [DRAFT] Focus on the underlying uncertainty, timing, and human-organization interactions that affect emergency managers’ use of forecast information.
• [DRAFT] Position the work as improving Air Force installation readiness and continuity under weather-driven disruptions.

Technical Approach

Describe the methodology and technical rationale, emphasizing what is scientifically difficult and why this team is well positioned to solve it. Keep the emphasis on basic research methods, not an operational implementation plan.

• What data, models, experiments, or observational studies will you use to study forecast use in resilience planning?
• What is technically hard about integrating severe-weather forecasts into planning under uncertainty and time pressure?
• Why is your team uniquely suited to study this problem, and what prior expertise supports the approach?
• [DRAFT] Use a mixed-methods approach combining forecast-information analysis, scenario-based decision studies, and evaluation of emergency-manager judgment under uncertainty.
• [DRAFT] Investigate how forecast lead time, confidence, and alert format change planning decisions for airbase resilience actions.
• [DRAFT] Develop and test a conceptual framework for linking weather uncertainty to installation-level planning choices.

Anticipated Benefits to DoD

Make mission relevance explicit and tie the work by name to AFOSR’s stated interests. Explain how the research could support Air Force needs in ways that go beyond the single use case.

• Which AFOSR research interests does this project support, and how will you name them explicitly?
• How could the findings improve Air Force installation resilience, readiness, or continuity of operations?
• What broader defense-relevant insight would the Air Force gain from this basic research?
• [DRAFT] The work supports AFOSR’s interest in research with benefits to national warfighting and peacekeeping capabilities by improving installation resilience to severe weather.
• [DRAFT] Results could inform better use of forecasts in Air Force emergency management, strengthening readiness and continuity at airbases.
• [DRAFT] The project may also produce generalizable methods relevant to other DoD installations facing weather-related operational disruption.

Rough Order of Magnitude Cost and Period of Performance

Provide a cost band and duration that would let the program officer scope a possible invitation. Keep it plausible for a white paper and note that this must align with the BAA and solicitation instructions.

• What total budget range is appropriate for the proposed scope?
• What period of performance is needed to complete the basic research objectives?
• Are there any special cost or duration constraints in the BAA that should be checked before submission?
• [DRAFT] Estimate a modest research budget suitable for a basic-research white paper, with a period of performance long enough to complete data collection, analysis, and synthesis.
• [DRAFT] If the team plans human-subjects or installation-based studies, include time and resources for approvals and coordination.
• [DRAFT] Provide a concise ROM cost range and duration recommendation after checking the BAA and any AFOSR solicitation-specific limits.